Bro. Barker turned tail and ran after my last post rebutting HIS comments to me. Not another word. Just ran like the wind. Pretty odd behavior for a man who claims to have cowed ENTIRE CONGREGATIONS OF LUNKHEAD former Mormons into submission. (Yes, he really did call ex-Mormons lunkheads. Apparently, he lurks on the Ex-Mormon mailing list, and emails people privately, on good days, when his meds have kicked in and he’s feeling spunky. SOMEONE please find me the email address of the LDS General authorities. Particularly, Gordon B. Hinckley. Gordo has been trying to mainstream the Mo Church for years. Perhaps the address is profit@ldsinc.com? If they figure out what Bro. Barker is doing, they are going to MUZZLE him and MUZZLE him fast.)

Please allow me, again, just for my own fun, to post the last part of his bio which is posted on the SHIELDS Web site.

Although most acquaintances consider Stan to be a pretty good guy, few critics like him. He has no patience for dishonesty and deception and is often blunt in expressing his feelings about this. When Stan has pointed out weaknesses in critics arguments and their apparent unwillingness to correct those errors, they have often pulled out of conversations with him. Three such cases involved Sandra Tanner, Dick Baer, and Ed Decker. This demonstrated dishonesty bothers Stan. He wishes they would repent so that they too might enjoy the glorious blessings of the Lord’s Kingdom.

This shit cracks me up. I could read it six times a day and STILL not tire of it. I’ve never MET an “apologist” who runs as fast as Barker. He should try out for the Olympics.

The reason I bring Bro. Barker up again is that he apparently is badmouthing me in private email posts to another exmo, my friend Andrew. It’s the same email where he calls the many members of the ex-Mormon recovery board “lunkheads.” What a sweet spirit Bro. Barker has.

While I won’t bore you with the entire email exchange between Andrew and Bro. Barker, where he keeps referring to me, because I’m guessing I am REALLY bothering him by my mere existence, he did say this.

Somehow you people seem to think that such language should intimidate; that it somewho give you power. It is the lowest form of yelling in order to win an argument. I’m not interested in such childish tactics and for that reason will not respond to the rantings of Collins.

Uh huh. Sissy.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.